{"id":"W4404208202","doi":"10.1002/cmdc.202400616","title":"Synthesis and Evaluation of Fluorinated Piperazine‐Hydroxyethylamine Analogues as Potential Antiplasmodial Candidates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ChemMedChem","topic":"Synthesis and Biological Evaluation","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India","keywords":"Piperazine; Chemistry; Combinatorial chemistry; Pharmacology; Stereochemistry; Medicine; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008241736,0.0001861959,0.0002648064,0.00007369332,0.00005309147,0.00005344368,0.0001157811,0.0002093733,0.0023171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009250905,0.0001432687,0.00009207983,0.0001688795,0.0001404972,0.00009828183,0.00005524451,0.0001188949,0.00004302209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007264901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009721005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007742205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005654245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985465,0.00005115998,0.0003161345,0.0003905185,0.000497369,0.0001983637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991754,0.0003066984,0.00007737688,0.0001848426,0.0001837498,0.00007187361],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004254338,0.0000529092,0.0003735268,0.0001645618,0.00009170745,0.000005272327,0.00007201146,0.00001263786,0.9159977,0.00007585394,0.0001868679,0.08292443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002784084,0.0000260271,0.00104141,0.0001482259,0.0002991776,0.0000174993,0.00008599671,0.03755748,0.9592099,0.0008674174,0.0002988391,0.0001696507],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899851,0.002376454,0.00001011695,0.00029034,0.000104209,0.0000876488,0.00004283151,0.00009710185,0.007006212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990566,0.0002502081,0.00007356754,0.00001298843,0.0002123618,0.00005194901,0.0001309585,0.00001752655,0.0001938105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08275478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02701772746986699,"score_gpt":0.2886554295292822,"score_spread":0.2616377020594153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}