{"id":"W4404329993","doi":"10.1017/s0266462324000369","title":"Mapping frameworks for synthesizing qualitative evidence in health technology assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; Grey literature; Critical appraisal; PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Health technology; Qualitative research; Scopus; Agency (philosophy); Thematic analysis; Medicine; Knowledge management; Medical education; Health care; Computer science; Nursing; Psychological intervention; Alternative medicine; Political science; Sociology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5030115,0.004562626,0.005999673,0.05971139,0.008586842,0.02646977,0.008719133,0.00596885,0.0158907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5899172,0.002761124,0.008022388,0.05125058,0.01972902,0.02442352,0.02598338,0.006902982,0.002834531],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03196375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07664534,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009139924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008391762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.36053,0.5449411,0.05718106,0.01059518,0.0243341,0.002418511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2958882,0.6056372,0.02307766,0.0308711,0.04277743,0.001748402],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000246215,0.0001176611,0.001418542,0.1044909,0.0007201478,0.000444392,0.09888819,0.005711682,0.0007987019,0.4213067,0.01171004,0.3541468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003954851,0.0002287531,0.001278087,0.1888902,0.001041486,0.000409622,0.06451909,0.006345464,0.001529398,0.5524372,0.1826288,0.0002964565],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004135308,0.0290301,0.8636966,0.02012253,0.001705511,0.04754722,0.003166243,0.0006193821,0.029977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02856964,0.009951945,0.8962251,0.001280981,0.0001384753,0.06188887,0.001028311,0.0001672926,0.0007494087],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4969885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6128753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5140733900311429,"score_gpt":0.6291885538405666,"score_spread":0.1151151638094237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}