{"id":"W4404551477","doi":"10.1080/22423982.2024.2428471","title":"Methodologies and challenges in Arctic human health risk assessment: case studies and evaluation of current practices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Circumpolar Health","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Human health; Risk assessment; The arctic; Environmental health; Arctic; Context (archaeology); Environmental planning; Health risk assessment; Environmental science; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Geography; Medicine; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2307094,0.001448982,0.001378512,0.004935984,0.008335345,0.01236023,0.007168607,0.004280265,0.002704651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1298073,0.0008762664,0.001464712,0.006050745,0.008183833,0.007499733,0.0108515,0.003853796,0.0008261218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01430966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03124543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04977111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1004714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7505062,0.2140179,0.009109002,0.005251964,0.01817141,0.002943449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7914491,0.1483884,0.01003158,0.01267816,0.03481056,0.002642218],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006665973,0.002022037,0.05623421,0.01185032,0.0004243394,0.00834772,0.3234373,0.01113525,0.002647505,0.04565386,0.01297774,0.5246031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001408244,0.001714143,0.02103533,0.03665426,0.0005058349,0.007605705,0.5722503,0.01062038,0.006082043,0.08053613,0.2623763,0.0004787286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3826325,0.07530493,0.2822255,0.111398,0.001799938,0.008974468,0.0011934,0.0004080298,0.1360632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5134764,0.03844563,0.4341403,0.004038479,0.0003347162,0.003719656,0.0003468324,0.0001972094,0.005300679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2307094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9486723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6331626992529074,"score_gpt":0.6630400121402711,"score_spread":0.02987731288736373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}