{"id":"W4404626264","doi":"10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.105194","title":"Equivalent Inclusion Method (EIM) for isotropic and anisotropic spatially oriented spheroidal inhomogeneities: A unified calculation module validated via comparisons to Finite Element (FE) simulations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanics of Materials","topic":"Composite Material Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Isotropy; Materials science; Anisotropy; Finite element method; Structural engineering; Mechanics; Physics; Optics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004998042,0.0003138479,0.0005116304,0.0002413226,0.0002010963,0.0001334949,0.0001865217,0.0001500394,0.0001491563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006706749,0.0003344945,0.00006625072,0.0002704572,0.000007546173,0.0001353858,0.0005600371,0.00007359159,0.00000948621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001429701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003502666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008934669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005733564,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980425,0.0001514923,0.0007685565,0.0003760199,0.0002863113,0.0003750969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991145,0.000191811,0.00009496753,0.0003341233,0.0001487898,0.0001157797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008878743,0.00003017217,0.000001004371,0.0005098314,0.00008779649,0.000001913261,0.0004826231,0.1830544,0.7987415,0.01632981,0.00006519395,0.0006069785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003657817,0.0002009994,0.000005180375,0.0001102292,0.00008043597,0.000001642356,0.00001712568,0.4865313,0.5083084,0.002435726,0.00175715,0.0001860776],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3769376,0.0000754436,0.6199254,0.00005684714,0.001280625,0.0008715494,0.0006238743,0.0002249625,0.000003710147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913583,0.00001891923,0.08569826,0.00002621782,0.0001324284,0.00009071324,0.0003434644,0.00008659338,0.00002035963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5366454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02130910159418185,"score_gpt":0.281731031926803,"score_spread":0.2604219303326212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}