{"id":"W4404645218","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.102073","title":"Long-term evaluation of evapotranspiration from a reclaimed boreal forest in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Northern Alberta, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Syncrude","keywords":"Oil sands; Taiga; Evapotranspiration; Geography; Forestry; Boreal; Land reclamation; Term (time); Physical geography; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Archaeology; Geology; Ecology; Asphalt; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006304529,0.00009074254,0.0002198152,0.00005856102,0.00004285504,0.00000460993,0.0001577607,0.00005532973,0.00001205714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004278842,0.00005716115,0.00007821976,0.0001585596,0.0001704046,0.0001124403,0.00002232941,0.0001542656,7.711275e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002221333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001274623,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1469749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9404243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985886,0.000177835,0.000444247,0.0001111998,0.0005759812,0.0001021964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992523,0.0003149594,0.0002603143,0.00009135542,0.00006158372,0.00001948589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121157,0.00005856337,0.9562081,0.00001941521,0.0002257226,0.00007125376,0.002593311,0.03542975,0.0001650162,0.00006195982,0.0003766501,0.004669123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006779237,0.000214196,0.9637515,0.0001795072,0.0003356478,0.0002794429,0.000125133,0.03128277,0.00004512803,0.00264004,0.0003714846,0.00009725821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943358,0.002457851,0.00002641154,0.002469624,0.0001303835,0.00006044643,0.000006853217,0.000001198261,0.0005114235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991966,0.0006079829,0.00001613092,0.00006960031,0.00004535495,0.000006217671,0.00001922959,0.000004648626,0.00003417498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7934494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8587055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0281801372815102,"score_gpt":0.2582667988872139,"score_spread":0.2300866616057037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}