{"id":"W4404693667","doi":"10.1152/jn.00123.2024","title":"Latency and amplitude of catch-up saccades to accelerating targets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neurophysiology","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Queen's University","funders":"Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Saccade; Smooth pursuit; Acceleration; Amplitude; Latency (audio); Eye movement; Computer science; Position error; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Physics; Mathematics; Optics; Statistics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005115987,0.0002825236,0.0002841699,0.001109602,0.0001214697,0.0004288741,0.0002062651,0.0004291698,0.001475619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008695611,0.0002098979,0.0002468544,0.0004072945,0.0001769742,0.0003665689,0.000291342,0.0004115765,0.0004818277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002545844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002685958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003399723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001936,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997162,0.00003071738,0.00003209614,0.00007209245,0.0001134719,0.00003537903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947041,0.002704906,0.001056413,0.0003274601,0.000814941,0.0003921145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007033682,0.000200576,0.3869608,0.0002023766,0.0003356766,0.0006862518,0.000636835,0.00131879,0.5523645,0.0003107629,0.0004877089,0.04946195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001757603,0.0003494428,0.9824352,0.000009651843,0.00004117443,0.0007026022,0.00005321404,0.001118482,0.01492378,0.0001185247,0.000215185,0.00001523139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959935,0.0006652575,0.001659437,0.00001513375,0.00001547649,0.00001971865,0.0005688412,0.00007321288,0.0009894948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976358,0.0001844912,0.0004056254,0.00001491667,0.00001076653,0.00002037028,0.0007590136,0.00003441941,0.0009345711],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003399723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006759882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08643505617667328,"score_gpt":0.3548612187057648,"score_spread":0.2684261625290915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}