{"id":"W4404732346","doi":"10.1111/cobi.14395","title":"Enhancing disciplinary diversity and inclusion in conservation science and practice based on a case study of the Society for Conservation Biology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Rocky Mountain Research Station; Society for Conservation Biology; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Discipline; Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Grassroots; Variety (cybernetics); Engineering ethics; Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00184329,0.00009225262,0.0001136036,0.00005493542,0.001605912,0.00001885421,0.0001277169,0.0000816001,0.00007295422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008915766,0.00007035808,0.00003041314,0.0005848857,0.0007974784,0.0002301913,0.003175438,0.00008787016,0.000001108322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003008297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005896289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003132534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003313956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989954,0.0001546645,0.0002168586,0.0003488622,0.0001408195,0.0001433794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985308,0.00109772,0.0001166869,0.0001404004,0.00008326333,0.00003112483],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002029857,0.0003285382,0.8751435,0.0000735903,0.00001581769,0.00001017465,0.01664123,0.00001546076,0.1006361,0.004758886,0.0007139608,0.00145972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002669175,0.001404623,0.8616444,0.000093503,0.0001025528,0.000141629,0.03934795,0.08300337,0.001977845,0.002801418,0.006471958,0.0003415479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861054,0.00004486649,0.0004926174,0.0123465,0.0001466837,0.0006525238,0.00003965016,0.00001915767,0.0001525449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963468,0.0000170709,0.0001512286,0.00340715,0.000007210831,0.0000375599,0.00002009683,0.000003508221,0.000009359469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09865827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07026516100796623,"score_gpt":0.3373233181762166,"score_spread":0.2670581571682503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}