{"id":"W4404789148","doi":"10.32920/27921147.v1","title":"Exploring parity in female authorship of pharmacoepidemiology articles: A case study of the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies and its citing articles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmacoepidemiology; Observational study; Parity (physics); Drug; Medicine; Pharmacology; Internal medicine; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02770241,0.0005431703,0.0009687869,0.02790743,0.01220607,0.01003565,0.002815057,0.00216602,0.007649326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1753798,0.0005410956,0.0008558957,0.04319712,0.003681854,0.00374513,0.005628498,0.001309738,0.0007094719],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02783691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06246796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5492941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6939896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.962339,0.007074243,0.00531764,0.0024174,0.01888243,0.003969326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.724087,0.1551813,0.04465967,0.008707637,0.05521465,0.0121498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004919716,0.0001808884,0.44011,0.006970052,0.0004786819,0.0425981,0.2859746,0.0002889977,0.0008921981,0.02377459,0.05892932,0.1393106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009529199,0.0001035682,0.3450866,0.01728852,0.001003645,0.02383776,0.3262188,0.001265007,0.00106314,0.006245526,0.2774427,0.0003493334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7658353,0.04491649,0.002101126,0.05676921,0.001001287,0.0009353122,0.007632439,0.00009070541,0.1207181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734411,0.01478746,0.001787159,0.002722713,0.0003700457,0.000230098,0.001218219,0.0000989845,0.005344266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9067205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.561286073784049,"score_gpt":0.3935679260487832,"score_spread":0.1677181477352659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}