{"id":"W4404801176","doi":"10.1017/s2045796024000738","title":"An equity indicator for assessing mental healthcare access: a national population case study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","topic":"Mental Health Treatment and Access","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Equity (law); Socioeconomic status; Disadvantaged; Population; Health equity; Medicine; Health care; Census; Environmental health; Public health; Economic growth; Psychiatry; Nursing; Political science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005591979,0.0001477389,0.0002548851,0.0003394336,0.00165603,0.0001353598,0.0002374554,0.0001224177,0.000141388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007406539,0.0001101998,0.0000489114,0.0004839769,0.0001677364,0.0006758876,0.00005508545,0.0001461339,0.00001088275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006594412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009326881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003466781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000618053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974713,0.0007397771,0.0004930774,0.0007248549,0.0001546525,0.0004163316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983242,0.001214364,0.0001658875,0.0001115375,0.00002129457,0.0001627071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003172061,0.000286903,0.9060165,0.00006733942,0.00002969054,0.00002959586,0.001243458,0.000002710996,3.035966e-7,0.02360206,0.001783382,0.06690639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081355,0.001606183,0.9262596,0.00002538683,0.00006305573,0.0008368607,0.007938811,0.002796984,3.452632e-7,0.05889793,0.0005195735,0.0002417372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817604,0.007195156,0.0003031802,0.005229138,0.003526582,0.001012941,0.00004859131,0.00008523212,0.0008388113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964808,0.00003070317,0.001292526,0.001335437,0.0005255925,0.0002356934,0.00005135088,0.000007666851,0.00004028642],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06666465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3212136542218814,"score_gpt":0.6122874211026024,"score_spread":0.291073766880721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}