{"id":"W4404838512","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144359","title":"Carbon governance or trade gaming: China's approach to addressing the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"China; Mechanism (biology); Corporate governance; Carbon fibers; Business; International trade; International economics; Economics; Natural resource economics; Political science; Computer science; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001293961,0.0004657535,0.0005829281,0.001042029,0.002226673,0.005281792,0.001341339,0.004225626,0.00679118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002017366,0.0001834971,0.000867225,0.0009828593,0.004988836,0.003227428,0.002027285,0.002967365,0.0001310239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00628347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01049357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06643437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1045155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992152,0.0002385936,0.00002023117,0.0001321399,0.0001204346,0.0002732886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999447,0.0001678432,0.00008372492,0.00007692518,0.0001045872,0.0001198522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003617737,0.00004487173,0.003508449,0.00002977238,0.00003540707,0.0002218032,0.0004697324,0.006449936,0.0002891419,0.9773261,0.002599031,0.008989508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009617796,0.0001132355,0.01244584,0.000164813,0.0001324023,0.0000985605,0.002224503,0.06780668,0.0009158397,0.879008,0.03692518,0.0000687368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4994672,0.004298439,0.03348375,0.06986275,0.000697976,0.0002371098,0.0002316059,0.000116093,0.391605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853942,0.0005472759,0.001095276,0.001835674,0.00009660233,0.00003866653,0.0000115706,0.000009128362,0.01097147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06643437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1320954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1176066061674111,"score_gpt":0.2926210738262001,"score_spread":0.175014467658789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}