{"id":"W4405013031","doi":"10.1177/15586898241305657","title":"Media Review: Philosophical Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Dialogues between Researchers and Philosophers ShanY. (Ed.) (2024). Philosophical Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Dialogues between Researchers and Philosophers. Routledge.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mixed Methods Research","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Multimethodology; Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Social science; Philosophy; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5256828,0.001023192,0.004154665,0.01135844,0.002147021,0.001685442,0.005245167,0.001339885,0.00191532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2923613,0.00080178,0.001214231,0.01627739,0.0121758,0.002775675,0.004166959,0.01246606,0.0001649287],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001280267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006612871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002395834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009717045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.748224,0.2064032,0.009680429,0.003623366,0.02780583,0.004263123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7272863,0.2440191,0.001602996,0.00305735,0.02082758,0.003206737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001226628,0.0008276507,0.003692629,0.002932441,0.002320551,0.0001396888,0.006548376,0.0000334879,0.02093143,0.04488431,0.03747394,0.8789889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002201154,0.003099422,0.01472557,0.003695826,0.0004796965,0.00007460569,0.005210377,0.001285019,0.009045743,0.8919922,0.06735191,0.0008385221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0971261,0.197079,0.1683664,0.4937258,0.006966212,0.01120052,0.001554402,0.0002745157,0.02370697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4075278,0.0617891,0.5232205,0.000119643,0.005594918,0.0002812895,0.0001853673,0.0003101459,0.0009712023],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8781503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8334287360136173,"score_gpt":0.6923099243927741,"score_spread":0.1411188116208433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}