{"id":"W4405019374","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12381","title":"Collateral damage: China's anti‐dumping case against Canadian canola","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; China; Canola; International trade; Business; International economics; Economics; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001762331,0.000363723,0.0002575156,0.001408057,0.01330244,0.003139461,0.001172852,0.005465433,0.006405517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004445821,0.0002529754,0.0004119725,0.001866952,0.004299078,0.001037029,0.001794625,0.003893148,0.0002916435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02620965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02365516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8336519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8760587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977587,0.0002379131,0.00004711986,0.0002126861,0.0007164243,0.001027088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996877,0.0008532913,0.0003676383,0.0002698262,0.001183724,0.0004484799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005449642,0.0002522417,0.1441931,0.0002929844,0.0002237753,0.0526272,0.02952493,0.009877735,0.005764237,0.6134127,0.09827539,0.0450108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002818044,0.0003859085,0.1791095,0.0006190624,0.0006015927,0.007633251,0.04192714,0.01973407,0.008883289,0.05576117,0.6844472,0.0006159788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6850605,0.001412038,0.0009869701,0.0346583,0.0001125534,0.0001139621,0.0003014476,0.00004335245,0.2773109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808446,0.0004278891,0.0001730604,0.00227222,0.00004070513,0.00001222309,0.00004315108,0.000004179235,0.01618192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1663481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3346555,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03537878235290511,"score_gpt":0.1657241162265175,"score_spread":0.1303453338736124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}