{"id":"W4405114966","doi":"10.1111/rsr.17392","title":"AN ARGUMENT IN DEFENSE OF A STRICTLY SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION: THE CONTROVERSY AT DELPHI . By DonaldWiebe. Toronto: Institute for the Advanced Study of Religion, 2021. Pp. xxvi + 345. E‐Book, open‐access.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies Review","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Delphi; Delphi method; Environmental ethics; History; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003213302,0.0003363189,0.001172801,0.00006396487,0.001223657,0.0002838892,0.001844025,0.00007864332,0.00003100279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008414959,0.0002067571,0.000391185,0.001361578,0.0006788232,0.0008616405,0.0006842212,0.0002261742,0.000006360624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007808142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003558175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05010902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1167428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954432,0.0006694571,0.001640602,0.0007321392,0.001070666,0.0004439208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956998,0.001463225,0.0007654519,0.001013658,0.0009571888,0.0001007358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001912935,0.00210158,0.0005016355,0.001045481,0.001131474,0.000009333296,0.07829867,0.0002669637,0.00006618944,0.006042163,0.9065982,0.003747061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001847947,0.001419422,0.00006677042,0.002334919,0.0008895815,0.00000348,0.09735931,0.00005229508,0.00002500363,0.0007009176,0.8949888,0.000311521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.09303747,0.8888092,0.00002184623,0.004546985,0.001478094,0.01013996,0.00008076015,0.0000372438,0.001848423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4446373,0.5536567,0.00001653339,0.0004119225,0.00004244908,0.0008442478,0.000007869049,0.00001621261,0.0003667828],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3515998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9562164,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06094927717346094,"score_gpt":0.442110422353404,"score_spread":0.381161145179943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}