{"id":"W4405123033","doi":"10.3389/fpos.2024.1305055","title":"Studying political decision-making as a cognitive process: is it interdisciplinary? A bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Political Science","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Politics; Political methodology; Discipline; Systems theory in political science; Field (mathematics); Political communication; Cognition; Social science; Biology and political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Political culture; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01488539,0.0005161461,0.001445414,0.1182526,0.001879132,0.01019001,0.001077776,0.0009680829,0.003292806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107239,0.0002986723,0.001379288,0.2091105,0.002520364,0.006263266,0.003043571,0.0007379052,0.0005406626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00301336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004549147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004635105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003832859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.978525,0.006815041,0.003240716,0.001471447,0.009292303,0.0006554451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8695447,0.09591228,0.0166535,0.004741781,0.01164217,0.001505595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001384726,0.0002184499,0.7152027,0.003658951,0.001286625,0.000341152,0.01221207,0.003006288,0.0008567821,0.02781281,0.008523243,0.2267425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005438225,0.0001507338,0.8495461,0.002135018,0.0009143258,0.0007519224,0.03335491,0.01675191,0.001608574,0.03551072,0.05904439,0.0001769571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9090958,0.01336326,0.01778268,0.004144604,0.0002239537,0.0008331883,0.00774136,0.0002890387,0.04652606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795865,0.004507926,0.01089678,0.000104218,0.0002589836,0.0006092506,0.002937425,0.0000400117,0.001058753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07872242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03736487312175203,"score_gpt":0.4660570301515648,"score_spread":0.4286921570298128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}