{"id":"W4405215138","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1388460","title":"Pain is what you think: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence toward a cognitive and affective approach for pain research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Pain Research","topic":"Pain Mechanisms and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Psychology; Cognition; Sensory system; Perception; Stimulus (psychology); Noxious stimulus; Somatosensory system; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Nociception; Audiology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07402848,0.0002969798,0.0004564847,0.001290059,0.0004298663,0.0004666576,0.0002189208,0.0002063885,0.00007714157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130987,0.0002583394,0.0001362736,0.001577635,0.000660761,0.0005498771,0.0002041421,0.001441562,0.00001414854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007798773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005800341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001756517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001057179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9879447,0.007338443,0.0003377375,0.001335849,0.001740193,0.001303029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880428,0.01050051,0.00002696802,0.0003798299,0.0007327359,0.0003171366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00174562,0.0003530624,0.04063842,0.001533734,0.0001203719,0.0004502905,0.006868395,0.000001458813,0.000169777,0.0002784105,0.1396218,0.8082187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005618822,0.006190772,0.02641065,0.01710271,0.0001328831,0.00006335246,0.1357963,0.7339913,0.0005650339,0.05321621,0.02010499,0.0008069999],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009010701,0.4176745,0.5535473,0.01073132,0.0005261271,0.007418411,0.00007364356,0.0001541027,0.0008639407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.886986,0.01505923,0.0736774,0.002748064,0.0008178243,0.006140176,0.000214086,0.0002340467,0.01412317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8779753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1174288525150905,"score_gpt":0.3888329011667629,"score_spread":0.2714040486516724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}