{"id":"W4405414698","doi":"10.1111/joes.12677","title":"A Bibliometric analysis of literature on hedge and safe haven assets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Surveys","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Safe haven; Haven; Hedge; Economics; Scopus; Asset (computer security); Actuarial science; Business; Financial economics; Computer science; Political science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01798486,0.001501314,0.004775211,0.2352967,0.001417924,0.005926938,0.002056733,0.001440295,0.008539613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1042126,0.0009168491,0.005566667,0.1837928,0.001210354,0.005362418,0.00294665,0.0009469255,0.0009976351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00500106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0137381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00641293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01207723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9760097,0.005760856,0.00881575,0.00165998,0.007073943,0.0006797435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8442611,0.1055172,0.02145771,0.00283323,0.02462008,0.001310664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004825949,0.00009177574,0.03262087,0.6801359,0.01242901,0.0007034479,0.003384432,0.0008345394,0.001280032,0.003960553,0.0166804,0.2473964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002914002,0.0005564948,0.1313478,0.6000112,0.07916597,0.002032693,0.008459781,0.001273786,0.002439876,0.00610726,0.1680327,0.0002810671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04752509,0.8980598,0.002612287,0.003658287,0.0005621366,0.001535433,0.03426533,0.0001970601,0.01158464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2170335,0.7488714,0.009310898,0.001050892,0.0005576452,0.003255836,0.01837562,0.00009444923,0.001449736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7647033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09511423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03263596302106415,"score_gpt":0.2740686734620623,"score_spread":0.2414327104409981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}