{"id":"W4405494207","doi":"10.1093/qjmam/hbae012","title":"A Neutral Isotropic Elastic Ellipsoidal Inhomogeneity with a Spring-Type Imperfect Interface","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Composite Material Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Imperfect; Spring (device); Isotropy; Ellipsoid; Interface (matter); Type (biology); Materials science; Geology; Geometry; Physics; Mechanics; Mathematics; Optics; Thermodynamics; Geodesy; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003309761,0.000229562,0.0003228963,0.00009268814,0.00005816871,0.0002171319,0.0002415716,0.00006590167,0.00001350709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003345403,0.0001427734,0.00005904285,0.0001711103,0.00001436696,0.00007637313,0.00002854235,0.0003592843,0.00001820202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004496815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002876282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.349334e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006487282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990812,0.0000139778,0.0004001662,0.0001107277,0.0001655694,0.0002283735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994664,0.0001079595,0.00008975105,0.0002021254,0.00004533643,0.0000884416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001936416,0.0001102376,5.657209e-7,0.001828256,0.0006360367,0.000088758,0.007879141,0.01754879,0.6386158,0.3215278,0.0001335372,0.0114374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001208083,0.003978993,0.000004529501,0.001270605,0.0007875763,0.002533452,0.002308115,0.7716983,0.08645351,0.1281603,0.0008006761,0.0007958306],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7491517,0.000673863,0.2493375,0.0000377884,0.0005258775,0.0001457951,0.000002505725,0.00007986564,0.00004505816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926441,0.00009951694,0.007009995,0.000008566677,0.0001687668,0.000003879856,2.314561e-7,0.0000589781,0.000005925785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7541495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5822129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007116954322374711,"score_gpt":0.2051595585098859,"score_spread":0.1980426041875112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}