{"id":"W4405513134","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123744","title":"Forest land property rights and forest ecosystem quality: Evidence from forest land titling reform in China","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"China; Forest ecology; Property rights; Land titling; Ecosystem; Land use; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Agroforestry; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Land tenure; Agriculture; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002057901,0.0002031775,0.0003887191,0.001097082,0.001406541,0.001255499,0.0008776548,0.0007189141,0.003586345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00457128,0.0001759953,0.0003715882,0.001620915,0.002852103,0.0009926183,0.001373137,0.0008866311,0.0001346033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003010794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00425735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1663541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2801405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986609,0.000311667,0.00008158328,0.0001514347,0.0002370667,0.0005574248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913623,0.001532086,0.004263429,0.0005431268,0.0008499693,0.001449096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002740614,0.0002559222,0.9911715,0.00002993482,0.0001123405,0.0001871026,0.001321783,0.0003180371,0.0001633182,0.001849885,0.000329407,0.003986661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003481232,0.00008117056,0.9969214,0.00001141433,0.00007176276,0.0000169901,0.0015673,0.0003334852,0.00008094947,0.0003389081,0.0005352258,0.000006511147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981406,0.0001606983,0.00001918649,0.0003838047,0.000003312545,0.000006570554,0.00006400514,0.000001248846,0.001220616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995671,0.00005860766,0.000006363126,0.00005573028,0.000003508269,0.000002207762,0.00006090879,3.844823e-7,0.0002452766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1663541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3307716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01453785944426025,"score_gpt":0.2112804912849284,"score_spread":0.1967426318406681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}