{"id":"W4405611161","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0315728","title":"Looking, pointing, and talking together: How dyads of differential expertise coordinate attention during conversation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften","keywords":"Gaze; Conversation; Gesture; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Conversation analysis; Turn-taking; Task (project management); Communication; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001819038,0.0003394259,0.0003056836,0.001138151,0.001128233,0.002164734,0.0004633534,0.0007406397,0.001510191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009208509,0.0003555811,0.0002300417,0.0003885779,0.001778095,0.001985995,0.002608882,0.0005093103,0.0002574157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000553358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005071809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003238045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003575801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981311,0.00107272,0.0000553838,0.0003205306,0.0002205182,0.0001999151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968658,0.002035223,0.0004212311,0.0001462323,0.0002450373,0.0002864165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006888364,0.0001183806,0.08802752,0.000552461,0.0001445573,0.002803006,0.6625434,0.0009635045,0.1579745,0.006519,0.0009829466,0.07868189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008278836,0.0007488453,0.5381058,0.0004041998,0.0003372237,0.003349517,0.3962904,0.01046351,0.01892655,0.0159415,0.01508189,0.0002677901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895014,0.0003133274,0.005208312,0.0001456799,0.00001170388,0.00001956013,0.00002659067,0.00003833847,0.004735131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976971,0.00008831277,0.001763605,0.00002284484,0.000003265141,0.00001532357,0.00001744212,0.00001330786,0.0003789413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003238045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00962013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0214912842169781,"score_gpt":0.2483628369823728,"score_spread":0.2268715527653947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}