{"id":"W4405649322","doi":"10.1111/jels.12404","title":"Patents Used in Patent Office Rejections as Indicators of Value","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; European patent office; Novelty; Patent office; Value (mathematics); Metric (unit); Assertion; Business; Patent troll; Quarter (Canadian coin); Subject (documents); Patent application; Intellectual property; Computer science; Marketing; Political science; Law; Patent law; Psychology; Commerce; Library science; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009007029,0.0003371506,0.0008641565,0.01018788,0.0005634003,0.003768347,0.001203821,0.001364081,0.003044263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1147867,0.0001453767,0.0006128271,0.00904304,0.001442722,0.003105724,0.001811106,0.001730324,0.0007377884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001047698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006214313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001486999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001102105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891059,0.001999887,0.001752788,0.000961867,0.005665679,0.0005139283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5897835,0.1827262,0.1962007,0.009473089,0.01720201,0.004614335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002439744,0.0002462094,0.9721974,0.000164946,0.0002381623,0.0001688254,0.0005908738,0.001762017,0.001107203,0.002875953,0.0008071816,0.0195972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002151103,0.0003576365,0.9830158,0.00008499133,0.0001234867,0.000492218,0.0009737476,0.005535745,0.002237783,0.003805783,0.003294056,0.00005709434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878946,0.001071496,0.002228426,0.0003070248,0.00003654795,0.00004275913,0.001138643,0.00003372791,0.007246898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982204,0.0001701531,0.0003330537,0.00002381698,0.00009640864,0.00001672242,0.0006582325,0.000006204639,0.0004750422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.990993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04763424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2554220099689555,"score_gpt":0.3405438970153245,"score_spread":0.08512188704636903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}