{"id":"W4405656521","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2443016","title":"Credibility of results in emotion science: a <i>Z</i> -curve analysis of results in the journals <i>Cognition &amp; Emotion</i> and <i>Emotion</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition & Emotion","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Replication (statistics); False positive paradox; Credibility; Psychology; Selection bias; Sample (material); Selection (genetic algorithm); Publication bias; Sample size determination; Response bias; Cognition; Test (biology); Meta-analysis; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Confidence interval; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Psychiatry; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1840185,0.000417653,0.002469217,0.005015334,0.0002820658,0.001087327,0.001023854,0.0002307869,0.0005812676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04563156,0.0002493982,0.00129114,0.02123105,0.0006365835,0.001658859,0.0001390989,0.0005083013,0.0001630649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001328833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002215973,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000952805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003855784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9676062,0.01032538,0.01276504,0.001933862,0.006897849,0.0004716607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839178,0.004872608,0.004918131,0.002250344,0.003870268,0.0001708626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002849881,0.008086504,0.09497596,0.004167237,0.004665204,0.0001262294,0.1298868,0.0203142,0.09036076,0.00951327,0.05088122,0.5841727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002756507,0.0003096595,0.8498352,0.002179051,0.003610536,0.00007614614,0.01013346,0.07802141,0.001486532,0.04921637,0.001754166,0.0006210102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662868,0.0007981461,0.02049147,0.002351766,0.0004602229,0.001394365,0.0007581285,0.00001956133,0.007439542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978755,0.0003776691,0.0007305274,0.0001829324,0.000106209,0.00003190367,0.0004486926,0.00001348434,0.0002331244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7548592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4677756151144634,"score_gpt":0.4796669029086554,"score_spread":0.01189128779419202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}