{"id":"W4405738164","doi":"10.2196/65528","title":"Consideration of Cybersecurity Risks in the Benefit-Risk Analysis of Medical Devices: Scoping Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","topic":"Quality and Safety in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; National Institute of Standards and Technology; European Commission","keywords":"Scopus; Mandate; Systematic review; European union; Guideline; Risk assessment; MEDLINE; Grey literature; Business; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Medical emergency; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09983887,0.0001019016,0.0009119705,0.0007753249,0.0001214481,0.00001825638,0.001060664,0.0005287974,0.007212861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0272486,0.00005905118,0.0003126149,0.001853664,0.0003908404,0.0001229024,0.000249739,0.006109287,0.00002034474],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001620883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00341732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01262535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0284812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795356,0.009798458,0.003040276,0.0001943274,0.007014413,0.0004168835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768386,0.02058337,0.0006695096,0.0003349386,0.001187789,0.000385788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007539529,0.001332569,0.3182351,0.2303005,0.004327562,0.002044019,0.1393075,0.0000593628,0.000007952079,0.10999,0.07456861,0.1190729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001406019,0.0009058414,0.05731884,0.8645855,0.001008109,0.00009770968,0.03038951,0.03182212,0.000025056,0.006147455,0.006077888,0.0002160055],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6977048,0.1320738,0.0008158393,0.1668421,0.0007066836,0.001014363,0.00003882614,0.000009429916,0.0007941733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.879369,0.1184866,0.00003719119,0.00174275,0.000311175,0.00001859078,0.000008222238,0.00000708464,0.0000194374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.634285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4722226044411237,"score_gpt":0.6681220074547993,"score_spread":0.1958994030136756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}