{"id":"W4405911721","doi":"10.1080/01930826.2024.2437961","title":"Library Templates in Academic Program Review: A Content Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Administration","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Content analysis; Computer science; Coding (social sciences); Library science; Academic library; Statement (logic); Template; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1466064,0.0004270566,0.00108414,0.02958717,0.00359572,0.006433879,0.002371991,0.0009400549,0.002697259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4180869,0.001085332,0.001251239,0.04424433,0.003197654,0.005027207,0.005757366,0.001253974,0.0006559132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02716196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05775821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02108219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03329671,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7680077,0.1306558,0.03050036,0.005506411,0.06118239,0.00414729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4139284,0.3929922,0.04170077,0.01957697,0.1277191,0.004082507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004162255,0.0005210929,0.09841345,0.01400593,0.0003109736,0.0004447912,0.1467901,0.001463038,0.002931851,0.01577909,0.03888329,0.6800402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002873769,0.0008652598,0.325547,0.02509652,0.001107929,0.00110756,0.1729295,0.009437814,0.01011518,0.009596696,0.4434817,0.000427506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.688852,0.01134593,0.1112453,0.01686566,0.0009228257,0.07685352,0.02092603,0.001189458,0.0717994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7239125,0.008293371,0.1921582,0.00334057,0.0003388978,0.05538963,0.007966758,0.0005510595,0.008049076],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8533936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7753381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0742932617460563,"score_gpt":0.3932998884405642,"score_spread":0.3190066266945079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}