{"id":"W4406061535","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107245","title":"Using otolith δ18O to assess habitat selection and growth in young-of-the-year Arctic charr","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries Research","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; ArcticNet","keywords":"Otolith; Arctic; Habitat; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Oceanography; Biology; Geology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001002531,0.0001072833,0.0001658931,0.0001972378,0.0002639045,0.0001151937,0.000416183,0.00008214306,0.001347309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000797524,0.00008963855,0.00003322566,0.002251846,0.0004559021,0.000257986,0.00124166,0.000481523,0.00001658614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003835754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008529628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01423489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01026957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978339,0.000326239,0.0002214875,0.0003629034,0.0007140053,0.0005414854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993691,0.0001540299,0.00002393878,0.0002625818,0.00009048755,0.00009978977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008111991,0.00004225753,0.9941466,0.0001070805,0.000006268485,0.000001621022,0.00027447,0.000009381079,0.002246644,0.0006044054,0.00113938,0.001340777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002368058,0.000106762,0.9875598,0.00004032481,0.000002531849,0.000003732089,0.0003291541,0.0009029942,0.002808056,0.001769681,0.00613733,0.0001028333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8549465,0.00000458139,0.0001086257,0.001241579,0.00007347808,0.0005197771,0.000003088577,0.000009874568,0.1430925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922424,0.00003180259,0.0008375539,0.00005169389,0.00002175261,0.00006965518,0.000001236033,0.00001347582,0.006730437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1372959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07347337652511145,"score_gpt":0.3485846912068579,"score_spread":0.2751113146817465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}