{"id":"W4406069293","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108711","title":"Environmental and economic assessment of mechanical recycling of end-of-life wind turbine blades into rebars and comparison with conventional disposal routes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing","topic":"Fiber-reinforced polymer composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Turbine blade; Environmental impact assessment; Turbine; Composite material; Life-cycle assessment; Waste management; Forensic engineering; Environmental science; Mechanical engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008261714,0.0004858095,0.0004126665,0.001258165,0.0004731303,0.0008115763,0.0005113403,0.0008394251,0.001505678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005585851,0.0001903316,0.000837415,0.0009022657,0.0003706162,0.0006665673,0.000359956,0.0002761226,0.000247201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001554969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004649694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005733105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01165062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999397,0.0001534421,0.00002481407,0.0000600068,0.0003017552,0.00006298321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995437,0.0001285637,0.00008159779,0.00002728209,0.0001944018,0.00002429563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01662339,0.002429416,0.1160438,0.001186872,0.0003784816,0.002079212,0.000175088,0.3949082,0.3360978,0.003187033,0.001394189,0.1254966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003357762,0.016528,0.3238354,0.0001534946,0.0005471202,0.000683177,0.001464348,0.2734485,0.3742786,0.002464851,0.006104887,0.0001558868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962242,0.0001648817,0.0008217767,0.0000147392,0.000005492651,0.00003138254,0.0002572737,0.000006541485,0.002473762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969255,0.0001981993,0.0008409981,0.00000589335,0.000002066377,0.00001729138,0.0001606364,0.000006342426,0.001843163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005733105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01139945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00669051402060711,"score_gpt":0.2317887284886595,"score_spread":0.2250982144680524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}