{"id":"W4406130525","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14863","title":"Quantifying the value of participatory science data for conservation decision‐making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Mitacs; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizen science; Citizen journalism; Quality (philosophy); Environmental resource management; Action (physics); Business; Participatory action research; Participatory evaluation; Biodiversity; Data quality; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Ecology; Economics; Political science; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001810207,0.00004698381,0.0001320305,0.00004758806,0.0002023938,0.00001820134,0.0006706752,0.0000342869,0.001205091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004068718,0.00003251948,0.00002924853,0.000303098,0.000466834,0.0001207773,0.0003132719,0.00007365819,0.00001326735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002048173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008192507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004524871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001434472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991789,0.00001447599,0.0003459176,0.000120063,0.0001831792,0.0001574683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998876,0.0004948287,0.0003115179,0.0002531089,0.00003968368,0.000024835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001224775,0.0005668488,0.3033006,0.0000828237,0.0001157779,0.00000499327,0.00119994,0.004435898,0.1340427,0.3924735,0.1243449,0.03820715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007524448,0.00008947539,0.9432105,0.00002794476,0.00006782625,0.000008479708,0.002992692,0.006419883,0.00461888,0.007405437,0.03432567,0.00008080292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897165,0.00002263353,0.004749716,0.0009749484,0.0003680383,0.0001455097,0.000014907,0.00000298297,0.004004733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977142,0.00001583367,0.001309167,0.0009311479,0.00001423664,0.000005561171,0.000001967772,0.000002082919,0.000005760002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6399099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1458188386878312,"score_gpt":0.3859474426107034,"score_spread":0.2401286039228722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}