{"id":"W4406130525","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14863","title":"Quantifying the value of participatory science data for conservation decision‐making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada; Mitacs; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizen science; Citizen journalism; Quality (philosophy); Environmental resource management; Action (physics); Business; Participatory action research; Participatory evaluation; Biodiversity; Data quality; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Ecology; Economics; Political science; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13657,0.001174557,0.001107024,0.003818504,0.002094378,0.008043206,0.001878181,0.001764949,0.006799589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4080636,0.0007056786,0.001792204,0.005007454,0.004417407,0.009838631,0.006109448,0.002567991,0.0004893062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007796308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007714182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008142531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008971491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.74431,0.2171333,0.006164493,0.006978144,0.02318549,0.002228594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2951352,0.5867514,0.04602445,0.04159034,0.0274081,0.003090407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002595533,0.001134674,0.1951957,0.004181582,0.003553097,0.0003162945,0.00420602,0.2145965,0.003072163,0.1034535,0.01052293,0.4571721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007334941,0.002608876,0.1548284,0.005374847,0.001748304,0.0002908742,0.008488626,0.3759576,0.008118219,0.3984435,0.04285511,0.0005520975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.544047,0.003023699,0.3345054,0.02249568,0.0006696274,0.00472365,0.008833705,0.000531822,0.08116946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9379701,0.000233388,0.05953135,0.0003232623,0.00006858585,0.00108045,0.0004410364,0.00003483677,0.0003169428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.86343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7222596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1458188386878312,"score_gpt":0.3859474426107034,"score_spread":0.2401286039228722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}