{"id":"W4406190764","doi":"10.1002/hec.4927","title":"Economic Value of Informal Care: Contingent Valuation From the Perspective of Caregivers and Care Recipients in China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Promotion (chess); China; Willingness to accept; Value (mathematics); Health care; Valuation (finance); Care work; Economics; Demographic economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Finance; Work (physics); Political science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003143106,0.0004634446,0.0004791679,0.001849378,0.0006446998,0.001532445,0.0006269158,0.0004889227,0.001034309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006977877,0.0002125154,0.0007260062,0.001770052,0.0008144384,0.001527328,0.001146322,0.0005591721,0.00004434755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003412693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001482542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03572752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02059225,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990085,0.0005251389,0.00006173334,0.00007963937,0.0001374811,0.0001876548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979616,0.001016641,0.0004085426,0.0001158395,0.0002410811,0.0002563878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002520733,0.0001593473,0.8978783,0.0001264124,0.0003171378,0.001396865,0.003048521,0.05401539,0.000652662,0.01361225,0.0005882132,0.02795289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000659458,0.0001810012,0.7049502,0.0001499454,0.0002153513,0.0003712984,0.006500576,0.2711025,0.0004159354,0.01370821,0.002256646,0.0000823361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971252,0.0002356957,0.001515105,0.0001666186,0.000004772317,0.00002241776,0.0000889136,0.00000128063,0.0008400379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994905,0.00008678746,0.000230701,0.000007386212,0.000003107489,0.00001070904,0.00005536342,4.309126e-7,0.000114948],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03572752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07103914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01035910861775772,"score_gpt":0.2975800255748212,"score_spread":0.2872209169570635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}