{"id":"W4406192553","doi":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.742135","title":"Phytoplankton composition and metabolomic profiles in aquaculture systems: A case study in Brazil's natural lakes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carbon Engineering (Canada)","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Universidade de São Paulo; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Agência Nacional de Águas","keywords":"Biology; Aquaculture; Phytoplankton; Natural (archaeology); Composition (language); Fishery; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Nutrient","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003343469,0.0002677929,0.0004213499,0.00009372079,0.0001275501,0.0001046058,0.0001624655,0.0001692323,0.00002977129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000197883,0.0002001834,0.0000399412,0.0005407354,0.00006929774,0.0003001157,0.0001162186,0.0003959102,0.00002685116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000181007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001446323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005124464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05065497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983731,0.0002237945,0.0004257829,0.0004839413,0.0001998431,0.0002935287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995341,0.00006469159,0.0001108367,0.000222734,0.00001207966,0.00005552684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009144944,0.0005365774,0.9762501,0.0001966671,0.00005945066,0.001912474,0.009791201,0.001415364,0.005057958,0.001311036,0.002458787,0.0009189227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009006598,0.0003819509,0.8179567,0.001131211,0.0002432529,0.003581295,0.07865393,0.07433628,0.0005132308,0.0005724052,0.01176208,0.001861101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995299,0.001242981,0.00001943937,0.0001676829,0.000218992,0.001312907,0.00003979744,0.00003843045,0.001660788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986269,0.00002085475,0.0001118575,0.0001207632,0.00002621596,0.0001135894,0.0000477211,0.00001041108,0.000921662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1582934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00604378415324155,"score_gpt":0.2514499540899093,"score_spread":0.2454061699366678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}