{"id":"W4406194096","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2023.0320","title":"Whose conservation, revisited: how a focus on people–nature relationships spotlights new directions for conservation science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Stanford University; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Framing (construction); Anthropocene; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Conservation biology; Public relations; Biodiversity conservation; Political science; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001243594,0.0001958688,0.0002242066,0.0000742181,0.003708136,0.0001179059,0.0009162364,0.0002582778,0.0001473888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005698876,0.0001219447,0.0003688358,0.002718837,0.002605037,0.000203699,0.0001248606,0.0004328392,0.000009178299],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002105461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001264392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004249616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001352652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980199,0.000146408,0.0002969205,0.0006354002,0.0005717127,0.0003296459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985564,0.00072296,0.0001758489,0.0003284554,0.00009698468,0.0001193791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001457337,0.0006415005,0.9256842,0.00005124044,0.0001114619,2.238482e-7,0.0007399411,0.004821741,0.001320667,0.05101789,0.01085847,0.004606996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005301186,0.0002369387,0.8587836,0.00007226362,0.0001042071,7.342396e-7,0.0003785933,0.01256652,0.00088156,0.1102816,0.01590092,0.0002629117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4954098,0.0001582014,0.0290989,0.4670642,0.0005364289,0.001478249,0.00007006063,0.0001496975,0.006034478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936247,0.00006330476,0.00271959,0.002322625,0.00005740237,0.00003526692,0.000004586851,0.000003610824,0.001168955],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4982149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0390745544821463,"score_gpt":0.2530126172828681,"score_spread":0.2139380628007218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}