{"id":"W4406504231","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c00901","title":"Comparative Assessment of Powdered versus Granular Activated Carbon for PFAS Removal in Drinking Water Treatment Plants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACS ES&T Water","topic":"Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Polytechnique Montréal","keywords":"Powdered activated carbon treatment; Activated carbon; Water treatment; Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Waste management; Chemistry; Pulp and paper industry; Environmental engineering; Adsorption; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002392677,0.0003419797,0.0004118037,0.0004854953,0.0002390237,0.0005559847,0.0003113832,0.0004860096,0.0009759287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004854903,0.0001404434,0.0004630882,0.0004180809,0.0001994777,0.0003478731,0.000202051,0.000318079,0.0002258096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004778545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003591029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004899641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007773472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995387,0.00006479666,0.00003512339,0.00007676776,0.0002319657,0.00005262658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996704,0.00005870271,0.00005462237,0.00002209841,0.0001569208,0.0000372672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008372873,0.0001942512,0.001513189,0.0003204863,0.0000392712,0.00006906214,0.00003744359,0.001839203,0.9841018,0.00003749962,0.00007509089,0.01093531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003752177,0.00454443,0.01290978,0.0000172305,0.00007724796,0.0000816133,0.0001378721,0.005846738,0.9751714,0.00005387164,0.001096901,0.00002532664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978841,0.0005306053,0.0007626142,0.00003253873,0.00001092765,0.00003331456,0.0001735597,0.00002354845,0.000548777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959269,0.0006200411,0.002199807,0.00002646004,0.000006851281,0.00002501658,0.0001756465,0.00001130491,0.001007983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004899641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00974226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04338244613432524,"score_gpt":0.3441435499335943,"score_spread":0.3007611037992691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}