{"id":"W4406625767","doi":"10.1186/s40854-024-00696-2","title":"The paradox of resource-richness: unraveling the effects on financial markets in natural resource abundant economies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Financial Innovation","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Financial market; Economics; Species richness; Natural resource; Emerging markets; Monetary economics; Natural resource economics; Macroeconomics; Finance; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001532309,0.000222372,0.0005008734,0.001141364,0.0005145491,0.001835663,0.0004072925,0.0004980386,0.01345413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008312712,0.00008930496,0.0004006479,0.00144951,0.001585881,0.002528591,0.001390837,0.001292187,0.0002914423],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001016669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009703924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02232629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01956302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997447,0.0001201169,0.00001099836,0.00003790255,0.00003655956,0.00004974542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942849,0.003815585,0.001193458,0.0001566797,0.0003725273,0.0001767823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002844401,0.0001802678,0.4580233,0.000813018,0.0003440725,0.001684906,0.003530816,0.02783675,0.001473495,0.3498513,0.01956191,0.1364158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004421433,0.0001149042,0.4160068,0.0007230488,0.0003326385,0.0002680905,0.01063491,0.09854696,0.001469095,0.4461593,0.02561081,0.00008921078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201242,0.00563276,0.01710198,0.02531864,0.000117367,0.00003821795,0.001474423,0.0001368438,0.03005556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978076,0.0006517321,0.0006750009,0.0002108021,0.00003207953,0.000005343667,0.0000774099,0.000009699876,0.0005302386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02232629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0450086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009748297885280883,"score_gpt":0.2133374048865824,"score_spread":0.2035891070013015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}