{"id":"W4406779754","doi":"10.1007/s11222-025-10571-4","title":"Particle Gibbs for likelihood-free inference of stochastic volatility models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics and Computing","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inference; Stochastic volatility; Gibbs sampling; Econometrics; Volatility (finance); Maximum likelihood; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistical physics; Applied mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004858473,0.001093328,0.002628573,0.001802383,0.001094981,0.002296643,0.003147424,0.00275851,0.004111954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03270731,0.002236697,0.001755893,0.001811769,0.003343744,0.003930687,0.003780498,0.004810439,0.0008219007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002355472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002841501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01752868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01390674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981641,0.000973845,0.0001050039,0.0002645543,0.0003524074,0.000140153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778786,0.0196474,0.0004030131,0.0009414812,0.0007192104,0.0004103377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001781544,0.00007681562,0.0007932457,0.0001224118,0.0001069786,0.0001054009,0.0001461806,0.6525772,0.000509439,0.3218472,0.002259946,0.0212771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001302944,0.000004986424,0.00005442493,0.000006146118,0.00000522343,0.000005980132,0.000003709892,0.9068701,0.00008796569,0.09266271,0.0002790744,0.000006593684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005504229,0.0003551067,0.9926099,0.0003232025,0.00006176387,0.00002571859,0.00009913997,0.0002944513,0.0007264141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4626499,0.001437316,0.5202176,0.0006208862,0.0006737455,0.0006792552,0.001811401,0.001191165,0.01071872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01752868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03485328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03705520290076345,"score_gpt":0.2709594421108115,"score_spread":0.2339042392100481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}