{"id":"W4406856626","doi":"10.1109/tii.2025.3528580","title":"A Robust Probabilistic Quality-Relevant Monitoring Model With Laplace Distribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education - Singapore","keywords":"Laplace distribution; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Laplace transform; Quality (philosophy); Reliability engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001176135,0.0002996973,0.000461643,0.0002899885,0.0005841173,0.0003886357,0.000563457,0.0002612406,0.00002110225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00142813,0.0002280658,0.0001000697,0.001602143,0.0002012266,0.0009824652,0.00000737587,0.0009638589,0.00006828251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004426778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004459258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002292254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001381214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960401,0.0001225262,0.001608895,0.0003179465,0.001460345,0.0004501551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956815,0.002495218,0.000405489,0.0006402162,0.0005936298,0.0001839788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003465354,0.000102371,0.00006915454,0.0000301355,0.00003212422,0.000001124493,0.0003259357,0.9479063,0.00001590737,0.002264163,0.0003713944,0.04853481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003614583,0.0003798878,0.00007756777,0.0006312182,0.0001694508,0.000007407973,0.004955488,0.9550813,0.009554991,0.02294944,0.001809901,0.0007687112],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01911993,0.000006189298,0.9771392,0.0002561401,0.001328629,0.0005207551,0.0003082711,0.0001492455,0.001171625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772268,0.000009304483,0.02042494,0.00004402469,0.0001033712,0.0001129151,0.000007862901,0.00001618963,0.002054608],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9300253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2585031187211878,"score_gpt":0.4090010822981091,"score_spread":0.1504979635769212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}