{"id":"W4406856626","doi":"10.1109/tii.2025.3528580","title":"A Robust Probabilistic Quality-Relevant Monitoring Model With Laplace Distribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education - Singapore","keywords":"Laplace distribution; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Laplace transform; Quality (philosophy); Reliability engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00214555,0.00113249,0.001253095,0.001006907,0.0003982985,0.001602676,0.00244821,0.001520106,0.001317826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005099927,0.0006815981,0.001320445,0.00105547,0.001252535,0.002375243,0.001094667,0.00160813,0.0003764505],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001147488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001135134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005710687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003082687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998329,0.0003656481,0.00008044243,0.0005395034,0.0005316497,0.0001537614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982457,0.0008134811,0.0003675292,0.00009360851,0.000426624,0.00005314337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001154281,0.00005362363,0.002087956,0.000112703,0.00006863572,0.0001969747,0.0001454839,0.9380928,0.004144905,0.02286836,0.0007367307,0.03137646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006315646,0.00001937046,0.0002210034,0.000003391792,0.00001320846,0.00003004315,0.000006262435,0.9960258,0.0004174672,0.003062773,0.0001837813,0.00001058906],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01117872,0.0001883451,0.9870504,0.0001879677,0.00001990413,0.00003015631,0.00006430654,0.000216594,0.00106353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338579,0.0006566726,0.06006044,0.0001806097,0.00007463106,0.0001815072,0.0003227943,0.00006343999,0.00460221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005710687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01135492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2585031187211878,"score_gpt":0.4090010822981091,"score_spread":0.1504979635769212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}