{"id":"W4406861737","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0309274","title":"From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists’ awareness of academic controversies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vetting; Public relations; Thematic analysis; Quality (philosophy); Compromise; Perception; Open science; Science communication; Political science; Citizen science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Psychology; Science education; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1932137,0.0006334966,0.001269759,0.008923083,0.01405658,0.02675789,0.002162892,0.004454838,0.001570642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3340534,0.001198495,0.0007218613,0.007306657,0.04060112,0.02293036,0.02228816,0.008858986,0.0002461512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01091435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01502957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003100432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003095387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7324484,0.2031085,0.01220165,0.007881984,0.03745701,0.00690241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4144621,0.4972084,0.04544486,0.01354613,0.02146597,0.007872574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007823485,0.00002764011,0.0107399,0.000427104,0.00004209086,0.0003576676,0.9505609,0.000084974,0.0009605424,0.01968925,0.0008651188,0.01616648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003162033,0.0001097228,0.009431947,0.0009733376,0.00005434231,0.0005608098,0.9135496,0.0003454246,0.0008959178,0.03174476,0.0421904,0.0001121349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.814595,0.008756521,0.0286155,0.09999476,0.001073898,0.0003037471,0.00007847133,0.0001118468,0.04647017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901639,0.001432948,0.003558065,0.003751448,0.0002288989,0.0001247532,0.00002168502,0.00005094729,0.0006675041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5413139065668342,"score_gpt":0.5586792311624386,"score_spread":0.01736532459560436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}