{"id":"W4406869168","doi":"10.1037/tam0000247","title":"Assessing change in risk and protective factors: A case study and examination of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Version, Short Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version, and a structured professional judgment approach to rating and formulating change.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Youth Development and Social Support","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Term (time); Risk assessment; Psychology; Applied psychology; Environmental health; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009750831,0.0005275772,0.0005904562,0.001768769,0.002719873,0.000811255,0.001441086,0.001560232,0.0008278235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02368254,0.0004977337,0.000913622,0.001298487,0.001173883,0.001658459,0.001829014,0.001764627,0.0001779885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002073977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01352142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03123174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926656,0.004986435,0.0005011652,0.000385928,0.001053753,0.0004070735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990729,0.00480916,0.001265364,0.0007185061,0.001960957,0.0005170301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008087296,0.008118693,0.685106,0.0006598802,0.0001815153,0.03503545,0.1207836,0.0005647641,0.003416142,0.002710619,0.0029187,0.1396959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003174531,0.01005981,0.6704829,0.001227796,0.0005186159,0.1283313,0.1556776,0.00615208,0.01086341,0.002722562,0.01328125,0.0003652186],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946281,0.0006688872,0.00158889,0.0005325223,0.00002862936,0.0004036869,0.00007465477,0.00001175221,0.002062944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915383,0.0007427723,0.006381727,0.0001061727,0.00001142602,0.0002462178,0.00005123489,0.000009419382,0.0009126475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01352142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05156791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05052909194998634,"score_gpt":0.3709174191578803,"score_spread":0.320388327207894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}