{"id":"W4406924391","doi":"10.1016/j.gexplo.2025.107685","title":"Neutral Mine Drainage prediction for different waste rock lithologies – Case study of Canadian Malartic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geochemical Exploration","topic":"Mine drainage and remediation techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lithology; Geology; Drainage; Mining engineering; Geochemistry; Acid mine drainage; Environmental chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003911923,0.0008870968,0.000419919,0.001641143,0.001097868,0.001135755,0.001192065,0.0007463892,0.0008302408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006885424,0.0002821513,0.0007427938,0.002053394,0.0006600705,0.000289565,0.000659002,0.0003680936,0.00009626723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01154737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006342951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9368362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.946053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996839,0.00002713425,0.00001293533,0.00005615691,0.0001013055,0.0001185477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995586,0.00008915678,0.00005259222,0.00002432631,0.0002020828,0.00007325266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006424749,0.0003734358,0.6788047,0.0002632157,0.0002645534,0.01305753,0.0007239547,0.2642572,0.008229711,0.001436586,0.002646166,0.02930041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008256731,0.0001752346,0.4867476,0.0000603671,0.0002242144,0.000914068,0.00518839,0.4952124,0.006408533,0.0005345198,0.004321367,0.0001307417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970075,0.0001183036,0.0006403521,0.0001283302,0.000002566197,0.00004459718,0.0009261139,0.00003054063,0.001101656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958956,0.0001450037,0.001458796,0.00002216868,0.000002285485,0.00001470354,0.001177613,0.000009818997,0.001273993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06316376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1270714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02067509696655123,"score_gpt":0.2590149094624232,"score_spread":0.2383398124958719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}