{"id":"W4407004218","doi":"10.1155/adce/1229062","title":"Stability Assessment of Concrete Gravity Dams via Multifidelity Surrogate Models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Civil Engineering","topic":"Dam Engineering and Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de recherche du Québec","keywords":"Stability (learning theory); Gravity dam; Surrogate model; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Structural engineering; Computer science; Engineering; Machine learning; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001370375,0.000748769,0.0005659779,0.0008202884,0.0002764864,0.000762145,0.0005840768,0.001057748,0.0009682591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002951667,0.0003838875,0.0008745355,0.0004680367,0.0005405546,0.0007301181,0.0008632882,0.0006825202,0.000171775],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004562346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006531174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002684979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002280303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995893,0.0001619877,0.00002463305,0.00004950892,0.0001364283,0.00003808942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987952,0.0007209129,0.0001910129,0.00009620609,0.0001551309,0.00004154898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000172345,0.000008397668,0.0005986021,0.00001558723,0.000006693168,0.00001825764,0.00001219861,0.9945825,0.0009254559,0.000872764,0.00004476508,0.00289754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001086034,0.00001162934,0.0001498967,0.000003828488,0.000001607715,0.000005431201,0.000003461724,0.9989715,0.0004090576,0.0003641433,0.00007588113,0.000002489271],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3695592,0.0005227915,0.6235934,0.0002963687,0.00003205719,0.00006821708,0.0004724212,0.000385679,0.005069851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724935,0.0001813187,0.02618031,0.00002117675,0.000007763621,0.00005595258,0.0003183241,0.00002541988,0.0007162019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002684979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007247269,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008328594196980371,"score_gpt":0.2636253459749469,"score_spread":0.2552967517779665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}