{"id":"W4407023704","doi":"10.1016/j.cement.2025.100133","title":"Assessing the reliability of laboratory test procedures for predicting concrete field performance against alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cement","topic":"Concrete and Cement Materials Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Alkali–aggregate reaction; Reliability (semiconductor); Aggregate (composite); Field (mathematics); Environmental science; Laboratory test; Test (biology); Reliability engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Geology; Materials science; Composite material; Biochemical engineering; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01299203,0.001629542,0.0007866076,0.002178369,0.0004554186,0.001086,0.001609481,0.001338146,0.0006989294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0237078,0.0004900313,0.0009148285,0.001035803,0.0007533344,0.0008539456,0.0008504879,0.0005777596,0.001021532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004889938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007527923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003196239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003862971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897842,0.003287055,0.0009767717,0.001846533,0.003809774,0.0002956359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667938,0.01518094,0.005264408,0.004817098,0.007497311,0.0004463665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002797829,0.002071138,0.6355305,0.0008210338,0.000948583,0.0002214001,0.0008419254,0.05776869,0.1796708,0.0004633591,0.0009943141,0.1178703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001310484,0.01625195,0.4345667,0.0002689823,0.0009389554,0.0007977213,0.0009704487,0.2269839,0.3129508,0.001070586,0.004719647,0.0003491971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8906559,0.001403541,0.103198,0.00006908535,0.0001303524,0.0004323669,0.001136347,0.0006714116,0.002302971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695417,0.0005036753,0.02788655,0.00003684199,0.00003534953,0.0001864934,0.001060074,0.00006579807,0.000683579],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01299203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06870919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01308340033328203,"score_gpt":0.2822061162052439,"score_spread":0.2691227158719618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}