{"id":"W4407068799","doi":"","title":"The Quality of Canadian and U.S. Government Health Documents Remains Unchallenged Until Better Research Can Be Undertaken. A review of: Lambert, Frank. “Assessing the Authoritativeness of Canadian and American Health Documents: A Comparative Analysis Using Informetric Methodologies.” Government Information Quarterly 22.2 (2005): 277‐96.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Medical Coding and Health Information","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Library science; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05571675,0.0007585858,0.00157764,0.0478509,0.01219825,0.029279,0.003459893,0.002135867,0.01546214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2698037,0.0006951288,0.001187718,0.09224299,0.01187949,0.01245586,0.00415262,0.001819086,0.003256591],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09057977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1737359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8319312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8790345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8921497,0.01453559,0.006978163,0.005334681,0.07658376,0.004418133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.542427,0.1248128,0.02997298,0.02285369,0.2716114,0.008322143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001872967,0.00007307922,0.04964236,0.0102433,0.0003277924,0.0001840393,0.01692511,0.0003076257,0.0008170829,0.07657993,0.1548638,0.6898486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002707239,0.00009216579,0.1261827,0.01521049,0.0003835531,0.0003260638,0.03044688,0.0002336468,0.001742573,0.00960943,0.8154979,0.0002474314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05783361,0.4344398,0.005100611,0.1915405,0.006025975,0.0005584925,0.03044332,0.0003748082,0.273683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.596742,0.3030469,0.02135579,0.0200268,0.003066156,0.0005226544,0.01372479,0.0004517598,0.04106324],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6572053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8070813106152318,"score_gpt":0.7193281085402211,"score_spread":0.0877532020750107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}