{"id":"W4407068799","doi":"","title":"The Quality of Canadian and U.S. Government Health Documents Remains Unchallenged Until Better Research Can Be Undertaken. A review of: Lambert, Frank. “Assessing the Authoritativeness of Canadian and American Health Documents: A Comparative Analysis Using Informetric Methodologies.” Government Information Quarterly 22.2 (2005): 277‐96.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Medical Coding and Health Information","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Library science; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04942755,0.0005534017,0.004646655,0.003407713,0.002478163,0.0003161505,0.001549526,0.0002704613,0.0001911188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002504689,0.0003599135,0.0003306089,0.008293984,0.0006869204,0.001484544,0.0003904933,0.001961646,8.192474e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005401623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01124073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8914705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.764158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9737908,0.01442992,0.006750924,0.000416636,0.003256146,0.001355562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763335,0.008036215,0.01263834,0.0008214762,0.001032932,0.001137525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001120274,0.00008436108,0.02424538,0.1621716,0.002413589,0.00000173583,0.01370192,0.00003634545,0.00000112809,0.0009440545,0.03980708,0.7564808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006776586,0.0001490682,0.08678675,0.07053041,0.0008371308,0.000002994592,0.0245312,0.0001159919,0.000001357907,0.0002949729,0.8155671,0.0005053786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003341592,0.9784305,0.0004741948,0.008315448,0.000294611,0.005298754,0.001597463,0.000008940032,0.002238492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006556662,0.9903976,0.0008675935,0.001691999,0.00005070706,0.0002028592,0.0001650969,0.00002462241,0.00004281501],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.77576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8070813106152318,"score_gpt":0.7193281085402211,"score_spread":0.0877532020750107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}