{"id":"W4407109961","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2024.53","title":"Standard rationality versus inclusive rationality: a critical assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Public Policy","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"King's College London; York University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Rationality; Axiom; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ecological rationality; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Welfare economics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002117301,0.0001718648,0.0002612385,0.0002234225,0.001616098,0.0004894433,0.0004342545,0.0001865186,0.001024509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004772387,0.0001710487,0.0001551742,0.0006667221,0.000685613,0.0008574386,0.0002377642,0.0002811177,0.00002388351],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002126131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007394258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02924773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007581803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967071,0.0008170169,0.0004633223,0.0003421389,0.001059029,0.0006114017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978587,0.00062945,0.00009681022,0.0003118347,0.0008229071,0.0002803132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000484625,0.0001469245,0.0333362,0.000008647563,0.00002183677,0.000002036496,0.000921266,2.893306e-7,0.0000100591,0.9497338,0.01331271,0.002457772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002209286,0.0001298422,0.3421891,0.00002472238,0.00007228757,8.417406e-7,0.002831768,0.00004772851,0.00005067157,0.2609116,0.3910541,0.0004779987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1394686,0.00007410494,0.003881745,0.4405826,0.002387174,0.0006483085,0.0005639749,0.0002868096,0.4121066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914886,0.00001282079,0.0007190154,0.003917228,0.0007740158,0.00006847339,0.0001155515,0.000008087361,0.002896149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09404889001179956,"score_gpt":0.4659379700926749,"score_spread":0.3718890800808753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}