{"id":"W4407149091","doi":"10.1002/pds.70112","title":"Evaluating the Role of High‐Dimensional Proxy Data in Confounding Adjustment in Multiple Sclerosis Research: A Case Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Propensity score matching; Confounding; Proportional hazards model; Hazard ratio; Proxy (statistics); Cohort study; Retrospective cohort study; Glatiramer acetate; Pharmacoepidemiology; Demography; Covariate; Cohort; Medical prescription; Population; Internal medicine; Disease; Confidence interval; Environmental health; Statistics; Pharmacology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2179289,0.0007759546,0.001078605,0.001800119,0.002109099,0.003711821,0.002093231,0.001659259,0.0009544843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2997963,0.0009095338,0.002581296,0.003837885,0.003550833,0.002588645,0.003985292,0.00199095,0.0001324804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003138716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004778244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01667065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01851255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6339645,0.3360495,0.009746821,0.004627526,0.01434644,0.001265221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5050121,0.3831614,0.04661126,0.04802824,0.01590017,0.001286963],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000825177,0.0002935966,0.9372315,0.0006303923,0.002614703,0.0008018858,0.002293825,0.002040306,0.0002819845,0.006686016,0.00100944,0.04529111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001120834,0.006259998,0.8115439,0.004615776,0.01172575,0.01215744,0.0103039,0.06813852,0.007716395,0.02498506,0.04087666,0.0005558481],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8666078,0.02008561,0.09898523,0.006938358,0.0003512564,0.001274466,0.0005925539,0.00009642781,0.005068283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541714,0.001997887,0.04215777,0.0006855614,0.000142006,0.0004545574,0.000135171,0.00002295569,0.0002327173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7820711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644329,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6246042941558562,"score_gpt":0.5871360786941076,"score_spread":0.03746821546174861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}