{"id":"W4407162380","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2024-0161","title":"Recovery rates of white spruce and balsam fir on seismic lines in NW Alberta, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Natural Resources Canada; Thompson Rivers University; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Office of Energy Research and Development","keywords":"Balsam; Forestry; Abies balsamea; Douglas fir; White (mutation); Black spruce; Softwood; Abies lasiocarpa; Geology; Environmental science; Geography; Taiga; Botany; Biology; Pinus contorta","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002481274,0.000236726,0.0001681138,0.0009391346,0.0008499451,0.0006528476,0.0005897959,0.0002132276,0.001263624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004895276,0.0001022782,0.0001440693,0.0008382909,0.0003803509,0.0001856636,0.0003183286,0.0002378275,0.0001991525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007215121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003934604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9645823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994755,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998044,0.00001012531,0.000006953909,0.00003440106,0.00006346148,0.0000807805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995152,0.0000418143,0.00008711941,0.00001484873,0.0001926867,0.0001484333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003076001,0.00009480104,0.9734564,0.00003025732,0.00003477754,0.000349078,0.001939775,0.0007661399,0.004491801,0.0001221187,0.0007733065,0.01763388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001660954,0.00001537813,0.9976943,0.000005340687,0.000004222849,0.00002871346,0.001443202,0.000264443,0.0001543976,0.000008285247,0.0003766185,0.000003312966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986312,0.0000778156,0.00003760147,0.00001878768,0.000001471713,0.000005304162,0.000326263,0.000005982992,0.0008956008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976996,0.0001052446,0.0001189504,0.00001435859,7.626135e-7,0.000003247578,0.0004910605,0.000001957763,0.001564888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03541768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07125247,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01369556867120219,"score_gpt":0.2680616377038428,"score_spread":0.2543660690326406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}