{"id":"W4407180276","doi":"10.11124/jbies-24-00293","title":"Textual evidence systematic reviews series paper 3: critical appraisal of evidence from narrative, opinion, and policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JBI Evidence Synthesis","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Saint John Regional Hospital; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Conceptualization; Narrative; Evidence-based practice; Systematic review; Empirical evidence; Delphi method; Expert opinion; Legitimacy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; MEDLINE; Medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01520266,0.0003839232,0.001465742,0.0005393294,0.0003775322,0.0004941432,0.001369609,0.0001706826,0.001685192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5167724,0.0002349342,0.0002563386,0.001799463,0.000729745,0.005012737,0.0004185649,0.0002354326,0.000296142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001242286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00100034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003948927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000160701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899204,0.003768901,0.002554676,0.0009845742,0.002367136,0.0004043329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7956083,0.198664,0.00123298,0.002360012,0.001816721,0.0003180337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002238628,0.0009074683,0.2289733,0.08968569,0.0008236187,0.00003351438,0.07316711,0.0003231571,0.06202329,0.1236421,0.1454279,0.2727543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005743399,0.0009083987,0.2433897,0.6084306,0.001027549,0.00006695189,0.06766699,0.008110561,0.01714574,0.02441707,0.02612295,0.002139161],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1963923,0.322889,0.03733615,0.4193948,0.005991975,0.01089574,0.0001596964,0.000427159,0.00651322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736152,0.01923837,0.004238148,0.0008838701,0.0002176294,0.0006160933,6.874491e-7,0.00001395169,0.001176064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7772229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2369833546920327,"score_gpt":0.5417262355122717,"score_spread":0.304742880820239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}