{"id":"W4407180276","doi":"10.11124/jbies-24-00293","title":"Textual evidence systematic reviews series paper 3: critical appraisal of evidence from narrative, opinion, and policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JBI Evidence Synthesis","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Saint John Regional Hospital; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Conceptualization; Narrative; Evidence-based practice; Systematic review; Empirical evidence; Delphi method; Expert opinion; Legitimacy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; MEDLINE; Medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2952121,0.003255742,0.006370168,0.03213333,0.0042053,0.01557451,0.005941942,0.009160399,0.02075738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4953099,0.003161762,0.007105146,0.02180471,0.01035404,0.01180357,0.01172887,0.01033985,0.009172249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01876753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07816031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003416366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004262108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4963802,0.3626519,0.07318033,0.008488768,0.05662859,0.002670229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4233871,0.4133835,0.04390982,0.02579037,0.08819395,0.00533542],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007477699,0.0001713163,0.0004981671,0.2647384,0.001593953,0.0003228892,0.009586384,0.001290844,0.002156899,0.0718042,0.1296709,0.5174181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006988631,0.0004949744,0.001458577,0.37088,0.001345479,0.0005450699,0.002807692,0.001059158,0.002476211,0.07383471,0.5441177,0.0002814465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002658599,0.4032337,0.275973,0.07986498,0.03434542,0.1272013,0.004033209,0.001471261,0.07121851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02604857,0.3091712,0.4866138,0.01595768,0.01044514,0.1333486,0.003616982,0.0009589672,0.01383918],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.704788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.869129,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2369833546920327,"score_gpt":0.5417262355122717,"score_spread":0.304742880820239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}