{"id":"W4407504803","doi":"10.1037/xge0001729","title":"Softening the blow or sharpening the blade: Examining the reputational effects of satire.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology General","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Psychology; Dehumanization; Mediation; Literature; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Law; Art; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007638636,0.0001592043,0.0002649314,0.00007516031,0.0006076504,0.00003020508,0.0006544169,0.00007529905,0.00052036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001088694,0.00007108824,0.0001627912,0.0003058364,0.000460085,0.00003060947,0.0001121646,0.0004990707,0.0000115799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003224274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004813492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001560226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003746237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983135,0.0003870338,0.0006352918,0.0002037363,0.0002096376,0.0002507353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978951,0.001082541,0.0005296475,0.0003933857,0.00006579288,0.00003353726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001921098,0.001525529,0.01466448,0.00003483522,0.003955519,0.0001608243,0.07844955,0.0003596305,0.3903207,0.1086735,0.3570779,0.04285643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0138574,0.004170597,0.6221693,0.0004537932,0.0009219751,0.002931664,0.1023269,0.0006397869,0.06949754,0.004744677,0.1774044,0.000882001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687399,0.007014593,0.0005866713,0.008413663,0.002210209,0.0003361172,0.000003039504,0.00001028532,0.01268551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926796,0.00004125079,0.0007670549,0.004316306,0.0005268005,0.00009665768,0.00000129686,0.00001435836,0.001556696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6075048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5697577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04524670290628631,"score_gpt":0.4255651425763335,"score_spread":0.3803184396700472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}