{"id":"W4407636407","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02125-1","title":"A Policy Scan of Cumulative Effects Assessment in Support of Renewable Clean Growth Projects in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Nature Conservation; Renewable energy; Cumulative effects; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Environmental policy; Business; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Economics; Engineering; Agroforestry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000286835,0.0002654981,0.0004215387,0.0002340139,0.00004645596,0.000007016614,0.0003528045,0.00005575922,0.0003730883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009516796,0.000278248,0.00006980963,0.00061947,0.0002134371,0.0002043321,0.0007227738,0.0001637784,0.000009722383],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006315846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001467535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7608908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4798465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99767,0.0001407508,0.0006248839,0.000436218,0.0006457886,0.0004823434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993249,0.00005997421,0.0002149532,0.0003117738,9.31333e-7,0.00008751715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004260415,0.0008138611,0.9830631,0.0001666079,0.00006190441,0.00005515201,0.0004366446,0.003719197,0.003841031,0.00053507,0.0006400992,0.006624745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00144908,0.0001331454,0.9857509,0.00008639832,0.00002498084,4.162154e-7,0.001886327,0.0001871238,0.008868232,0.001152182,0.0002475859,0.0002136837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9099624,0.00001218585,0.00005825569,0.000218328,0.00008827552,0.00102582,0.00002495631,0.000005915966,0.0886039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969857,0.0001300248,0.0006972331,0.0004046715,0.000006331873,0.00009315109,0.00002320013,0.00001790301,0.001641838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2810443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00467985245899666,"score_gpt":0.2515167938055736,"score_spread":0.246836941346577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}