{"id":"W4407708459","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-mbr7t-v4","title":"How THC Works: Structural Insights Explaining Ligand Affinity for, and Partial Agonism of, Cannabinoid Receptor 1","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada; University of Windsor","keywords":"Agonism; Cannabinoid; Cannabinoid receptor; Ligand (biochemistry); Receptor; Chemistry; Neuroscience; Psychology; Political science; Biochemistry; Antagonist","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001287886,0.000489567,0.0005968254,0.0002223758,0.0005956667,0.0006374345,0.0006646639,0.001046679,0.003622549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004297782,0.0003735545,0.0004389562,0.0001792957,0.0005579864,0.0008689389,0.0003410423,0.0005126062,0.0006900915],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007508665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007627314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009082767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007679373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999503,0.000008796325,0.000001971152,0.000009472317,0.00001217763,0.00001722308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999359,0.00002375151,0.000008721972,0.000007832393,0.000008051702,0.00001577358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003792369,0.0001471396,0.003217445,0.0003846969,0.00007721244,0.0009455933,0.0003106049,0.8379974,0.09625144,0.0480919,0.002033275,0.01016402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000809907,0.00008408394,0.001210964,0.00001991083,0.00002687633,0.00007742069,0.0001034453,0.9771861,0.004426368,0.01508574,0.001677135,0.00002099128],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.935152,0.00283953,0.03155519,0.002558377,0.0001311543,0.00005065737,0.0008104916,0.0004573249,0.02644537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863284,0.002418741,0.007141801,0.0002131491,0.00003716183,0.00003815631,0.0003609906,0.0001136778,0.003347927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009082767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01805979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02842263476312203,"score_gpt":0.301043096127845,"score_spread":0.272620461364723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}