{"id":"W4407905155","doi":"10.1037/pspa0000436","title":"Reactions to undesired outcomes: Evidence for the opposer’s loss effect.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Social psychology; Framing (construction); Psychology; Feeling; Preference; Framing effect; Phenomenon; Negativity effect; Salience (neuroscience); PsycINFO; Opposition (politics); Negativity bias; Positive economics; Persuasion; Politics; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Microeconomics; MEDLINE; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004793028,0.0002836336,0.0003307491,0.0005057653,0.0003769462,0.001182673,0.0005270859,0.0009274473,0.03594831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03802536,0.0003003135,0.0003290877,0.0002723612,0.001197564,0.000981012,0.001115136,0.001600555,0.001216635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002091362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002101386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005935854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000548725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982389,0.0009975636,0.00008242223,0.0002399236,0.000334411,0.0001067703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9464633,0.03833244,0.009064461,0.003699018,0.0007943434,0.001646538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02639773,0.006378702,0.6820766,0.001826302,0.001081421,0.002029669,0.01153593,0.001145799,0.02679333,0.02735654,0.008793345,0.2045846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004717786,0.001411972,0.9777864,0.0002448496,0.0003805142,0.0007778021,0.001995736,0.001383089,0.001514745,0.009070061,0.004915074,0.00004805647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9314842,0.0007031781,0.001689389,0.001431967,0.0001595635,0.00007623635,0.0003236384,0.000018476,0.06411332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955361,0.0003234374,0.001003931,0.0006489261,0.00006519141,0.00006679225,0.0001715266,0.00002121681,0.002162841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03594831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4559307566574968,"score_gpt":0.5792925075382016,"score_spread":0.1233617508807048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}