{"id":"W4407949291","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000003034","title":"Exploring the evolution of evidence synthesis: a bibliometric analysis of umbrella reviews in medicine","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Systematic review; Web of science; Data science; Field (mathematics); Thematic analysis; Scopus; Medicine; MEDLINE; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Sociology; Meta-analysis; Qualitative research; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1719073,0.001991085,0.005713121,0.2806929,0.003842124,0.02221929,0.002827594,0.002094618,0.003074415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6094661,0.001251837,0.006494312,0.2860332,0.003894316,0.01375711,0.01166579,0.00173323,0.0005533688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01181768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01739851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006457081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007472825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7334372,0.1183998,0.06924278,0.0126437,0.06403538,0.002241035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3235349,0.5102379,0.07769302,0.02531094,0.06108119,0.002142061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007810419,0.0001445708,0.2080845,0.1120648,0.0175145,0.001240196,0.04121477,0.006305587,0.00283329,0.03856343,0.0212393,0.5500141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005606588,0.000907681,0.3341498,0.1339178,0.03207911,0.003851406,0.04934093,0.05785731,0.00668201,0.1618046,0.2175896,0.001259133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3829472,0.353042,0.1330602,0.02587956,0.002469024,0.01453047,0.0424796,0.002383119,0.04320873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7088488,0.07273964,0.1916315,0.001341733,0.001191113,0.01116452,0.0111009,0.0005416156,0.001440153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8280927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9091437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9656022386831907,"score_gpt":0.6232191038898994,"score_spread":0.3423831347932913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}