{"id":"W4407949291","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000003034","title":"Exploring the evolution of evidence synthesis: a bibliometric analysis of umbrella reviews in medicine","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Citation; Systematic review; Web of science; Data science; Field (mathematics); Thematic analysis; Scopus; Medicine; MEDLINE; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Sociology; Meta-analysis; Qualitative research; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3375327,0.0005550423,0.03315978,0.1554905,0.00004788366,0.00002626574,0.00172504,0.0001565408,0.00109565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4304545,0.0001839942,0.005541356,0.3304659,0.0005297273,0.0002544843,0.0001830312,0.0002757316,0.00001264621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002493438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000342531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006520401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006788784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9458774,0.01890341,0.0281357,0.00106649,0.005693978,0.000323037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7585847,0.2077992,0.02550508,0.005270754,0.002658662,0.0001816996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005126161,0.00002757222,0.003069712,0.02794208,0.001608882,0.000002646764,0.0001723406,0.000002260347,4.856756e-7,0.0001233752,0.0486033,0.9184422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004520633,0.00005487312,0.007208762,0.2161658,0.02332448,0.000004110705,0.0006968142,0.00006853363,0.000001105365,0.0002510442,0.751977,0.0002022469],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003415025,0.9959717,0.0002874912,0.00177372,0.0002285516,0.0008400285,0.00001368852,0.000001488677,0.0005418564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002368238,0.9967781,0.00002713296,0.0001257264,0.00009240652,0.0001600796,0.000006429144,0.000009308973,0.0004325858],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.91824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9656022386831907,"score_gpt":0.6232191038898994,"score_spread":0.3423831347932913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}