{"id":"W4407989365","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109775","title":"Conservative Immersed Boundary Methods on Cartesian grids for inviscid compressible flows simulation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inviscid flow; Cartesian coordinate system; Immersed boundary method; Mechanics; Compressibility; Compressible flow; Physics; Boundary (topology); Classical mechanics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002719334,0.0001272241,0.0002026021,0.000260274,0.00007364742,0.00009672577,0.0001550691,0.00005578183,0.000009857641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006730967,0.0001189972,0.0001076828,0.00009197715,0.0000322278,0.00015628,0.00002411662,0.0001408832,7.850562e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001178362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006731338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004673288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008805137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991719,0.00003378599,0.0003910506,0.0001020037,0.0001913253,0.0001099468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998885,0.0005539122,0.00003781459,0.00006028059,0.0004110831,0.00005187177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001700789,0.00003231739,0.0002663457,0.00002302817,0.0002615051,0.000006315659,0.000124049,0.9603904,0.007413788,0.003038781,0.0009836141,0.02728978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000980543,0.00008187382,0.002828833,0.0001188016,0.0000255509,0.00001047894,0.00003297694,0.9846864,0.0004408066,0.004177982,0.006514971,0.0001007275],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1771366,0.0006213147,0.8179848,0.0009336904,0.002440848,0.0001314715,0.0000657032,0.00002211546,0.0006634713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518411,0.000100802,0.04720086,0.0004394296,0.000269264,0.00000583667,0.00004849876,0.00001708907,0.00007712006],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7747045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4852564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0120572288253287,"score_gpt":0.3227038462996091,"score_spread":0.3106466174742804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}