{"id":"W4408254599","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf030","title":"Genetic-based conservation status indicators applied to endemics with restricted distributions: a case for eastern Amazonian cangas plants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Botany","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Genetic diversity; Inbreeding; Selfing; Population; Effective population size; Endemism; Conservation genetics; Ecology; Population fragmentation; Biodiversity; Population size; Population bottleneck; Inbreeding depression; Demography; Microsatellite; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393075,0.0002802738,0.0003084645,0.001055089,0.0004846148,0.0007553056,0.0006762897,0.0003704645,0.0007193681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01004311,0.0001022536,0.0003279468,0.001352485,0.0007161801,0.0007363577,0.0005344702,0.0005079943,0.0000387702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001330553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008170194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0622365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1100282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994903,0.0002743977,0.00002448244,0.0001044593,0.00006682466,0.00003959094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961855,0.002455603,0.0004923134,0.0002955128,0.0003975608,0.0001734076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001130277,0.00009179278,0.8793363,0.0001911495,0.0001767362,0.0008561987,0.001396105,0.04773356,0.002807598,0.002047061,0.000305896,0.06494462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002692262,0.0002787137,0.7208526,0.000144325,0.000300897,0.0007405367,0.00315586,0.2656004,0.001228541,0.005218166,0.00239777,0.00005528833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994165,0.0002925071,0.004053031,0.0002441526,0.000004399099,0.00002885334,0.00008435919,0.0000237192,0.001103922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969707,0.00005859138,0.002863527,0.00001704022,0.000001893522,0.00000743514,0.00003487395,0.000003472177,0.00004256001],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0622365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1237485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02272302193200866,"score_gpt":0.2814851859306751,"score_spread":0.2587621639986665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}